| US courts 'should try terror cases' |
| Written by ALJAZEERA. NET | |||
| Thursday, 29 May 2008 09:14 | |||
|
Civilian courts in the US, not military tribunals, should be used to try those facing terrorism charges, according to a report by former federal prosecutors. In the report released on Wednesday, two former assistant district attorneys said civilian courts would produce reliable, fair results and still protect US national security.
Although the US justice system is flawed, it has managed to successfully handle a large number of important and challenging "terror-related" prosecutions, said Richard Zabel and James Benjamin from the New York law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld.
In contrast, the Bush administration's military tribunals in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have been continually delayed. The report examined 123 cases, including that of the first attack on the World Trade Centre in 1993 and the East African embassy bombings in 1998. Legal frameworks The report also said that many of the arguments used by the US authorities against trying suspects in civilian courts were not viable. Prosecutors have access to a wide range of law enforcement tools, including specific "anti-terror" legislation, they have the ability to seek lengthy sentences for suspects. They also have the legal framework in place - the US Classified Information Procedures Act - to balance the defendant's right to a fair trial with national security concerns, the report said. The two lawyers worked with the group Human Rights First to produce the study, In Pursuit Of Justice.
|